Legal Opinion
Bloxam v. Low Cost Interlock, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 9, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00391Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT CURTIS BLOXAM ) 3:21-CV-00391 (KAD) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LOW COST INTERLOCK, INC. ) JUNE 9, 2022 Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 21) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: This case arises out of Plaintiff Curtis Bloxam’s (“Plaintiff”) use of an ignition locking device manufactured by Defendant Low Cost Interlock, Inc. (“LCI”), and the alleged failure of the device to operate or function properly. Plaintiff brings two claims—negligent infliction of emotional distress and a violation of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Lynch v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.