O'Mara v. Wabash Railroad
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, C. J.
This was a vacation appeal. The transcript was filed, and a notice was issued by the clerk of this court and served upon an attorney for the appellee. No other notice was issued, and no other service was had or sought. Under section 652, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (640, R. S. 1881), this notice would not be sufficient to give this court jurisdiction of the appellee. Hazelton v. DePriest, 143 Ind. 368; Tate v. Hamlin, 149 Ind. 94.
The appellee, in support of its motion to dismiss the appeal, insists that the act of 1897, Acts 1897, p. 277, purporting to amend section 640 above referred to, and providing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tate v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Feibleman v. State ex rel. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Boring v. State ex rel. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Hazleton v. De PriestIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Whisler v. WhislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Mankin v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Dougherty v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Ashley v. HendersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.