Forbes v. Finch
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NEESE, District Judge.
This is a judicial review of the plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g). The decision of December 24, 1968 of an appeals council, which affirmed a hearing examiner’s decision denying Mr. Forbes such benefits, became the final decision of the defendant Secretary.
The plaintiff claims that he became unable to work on May 1, 1966. The hearing examiner found that the plaintiff was not under a disability within the meaning of the aforementioned Act. The issue on this review is whether such finding is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Clistie Bell Thomas v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Herbert E. BolasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Berry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ora P. Hall v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- William B. Vitek v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Hazel Cutler v. Caspar Weinberger, as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Hubert Brand v. Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Kelley v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1974
- Tillman v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.