Legal Opinion

Burggraff v. Baum

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 10, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Verna and Joseph Baum appeal from the judgment entered after a bench trial in the Superior Court (Knox County, Marsano, J.) rescinding a contract for the purchase of land. They argue the trial court erred by applying the doctrine of mutual mistake of fact to rescind their contract. We agree and vacate the judgment.

[¶ 2] This case arises from an installment contract to purchase roughly eight-and-a-half acres of undeveloped shorefront property at Mill Cove in St. George. Verna Baum and her husband, Joseph Baum, agreed to sell the lot to David Burggraff and his wife,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Interstate Industrial Uniform Rental Service, Inc. v. Couri Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Webb v. WebbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Moulton v. MoultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Stewart v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Janusz v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Raynes v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  3. Edney v. EdneySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  4. Michaela (Belair) Boland v. Nicholas BelairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API