Legal Opinion

President & Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. Janowitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAldrich, J.

On July 12, 1933, Julius Janowitz executed, duly acknowledged and delivered to the plaintiff as trustee a certain indenture of inter vivos trust. The instrument reserved the right to the donor to modify, amend, alter or revoke the trust agreement, in whole or in part, by an instrument in writing, duly signed, executed and delivered to the trustee. Pursuant to that reserved right of modification and amendment the donor subsequently executed, acknowledged and delivered to the trustee four separate modification and amendatory instruments as follows: First. The first dated August 11, 1934.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. In Re the Will of FowlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of PiffardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Rabbitt v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  5. Deke v. HuenkemeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Welch v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Thomas v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API