Legal Opinion
David v. Nemerofsky
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1945No. 249PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
Appellants, husband and wife, owning certain real estate as tenants by the en-tireties, sued appellee for arrears of rent. He denied that he had ever been tenant of the property or liable for rent. He produced evidence indicating that although he was living with his family on the premises, his wife had been the responsible tenant.
Appellants produced the record and judgment in a prior suit for possession instituted by appellant husband alone against appellee, wherein the complaint alleged that the latter was a tenant by sufferance of the property involved. From this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brown v. Southall Realty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Williams v. GerstenfeldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Cecil Tutt v. Lewis DobyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Ward v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Zoby v. KosmadakesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.