Legal Opinion
FORD v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 25, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00963Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JAMES K. FORD, Petitioner, Civ. No. 21-963 (RK) v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE : MEMORANDUM & ORDER OF NEW JERSEY, et al., : Respondents, : KIRSCH, District Judge Petitioner, James K. Ford (“Petitioner” or “Ford”), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See ECF No. 1. Having reviewed the habeas petition, Respondents’ response, Petitioner’s reply, and the relevant record, the Court finds that the habeas petition contains unexhausted claims which potentially subjects it…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lisa Michelle Lambert v. Charlotte Blackwell, Mrs., Superintendent the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.