Legal Opinion

State v. Connely

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1993No. S-92-761PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

Pursuant to verdict, the defendant-appellant, Steven M. Connely, was adjudged guilty on each of two counts of dispensing or delivering an anabolic steroid, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-446 and 28-447 (Cum. Supp. 1990), and was thereafter sentenced. Upon Connely’s appeal, the district court affirmed the judgment of the county court. Connely now asserts that the district court erred in failing to find that the county court erred on the record by its failure to find that (1) §§ 28-446 and 28-447 are unconstitutionally vague, (2) he was unlawfully entrapped, and (3)…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Village of Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BrunzoNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. StottNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Health v. JeffreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API