Legal Opinion

United States v. Virzera

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 7, 1945No. Nos. 95, 96PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

The two appellants here were each tried separately and convicted of violations of the Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 311. Each appealed and the appeals were consolidated. The trial records in the two cases were substantially the same, as are also the assignments of error.

The indictments charged that each appellant had knowingly made false statements as to his “liability or nonliability * * * for service under the provisions” of the Act, in that each had falsely stated that he was a citizen not of the United States but of Italy. It was stipulated or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DeansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  2. In re ConisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Albert Nelms Lucke, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Virzera v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API