Legal Opinion
Navy Charleston Naval Shipyard v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 14, 1989No. 88-2131PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
The Charleston Naval Shipyard (“the Shipyard”) petitions for review of an order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (“FLRA”) ordering the Shipyard to negotiate over an employee bonus incentive program proposed by the Federal Metal Trades Council of Charleston (“the Council”). The Shipyard argues that negotiating over the proposal would interfere with its prerogative to determine its own budget as provided for by the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Act (Title VII of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978), 5 U.S.C. §§ 7101-35 (“the Act”). We agree and decline…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Library of Congress v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, National Treasury Employees Union, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Navy Charleston Naval Shipyard, Charleston, South Carolina, Petitioner v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989