Legal Opinion

Potter v. Consumer Auto Finance Inc

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided October 27, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00154Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE GREENEVILLE DIVISION WILLIAM POTTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2:21-CV-154 ) CONSUMER AUTO FINANCE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint [Doc. 2] and a Motion [Doc. 1] to proceed in forma pauperis. The Motion is before the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, and the standing orders of this Court. Plaintiff is representing himself in this action. The purpose of

28 U.S.C. § 1915

is to ensure that indigent litigants have meaningful access to the courts. Adkins…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API