Legal Opinion

In re Romero

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 13, 2006No. 2006-B-2296Published

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected his client’s legal matter, failed to communicate with his client, and failed to timely refund costs paid in advance. This misconduct occurred in the same time frame as the misconduct forming the basis of respondent’s earlier disciplinary matter. Prior to the filing of new formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

*1206IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ChatelainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. In re RomeroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API