Legal Opinion
In re Romero
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 29, 2005No. 2004-B-3087PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
hPER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Robert M. Romero, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible to practice.
FORMAL CHARGES
The ODC filed two sets of formal charges against respondent. The first set of formal charges, consisting of four counts and bearing the disciplinary board’s docket number 03-DB-008, was filed on January 29, 2003. The second .set -of formal charges, consisting of one count and bearing the disciplinary board’s…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In re PinkstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- In re FrankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- In re CollinsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re BrancatoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- In re RomeroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007