Legal Opinion

Smith v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1986No. Docket 84796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCynar, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal by leave granted from an order of the Saginaw Circuit Court dismissing their appeal from the district court for failure to file a brief. They also appeal from the order of the district court granting defendant’s motion for directed verdict.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover money loaned to Daniel Riley. Riley was an account executive (stockbroker) employed by defendant and assigned to plaintiffs’ account. Riley had handled plaintiffs’ account for almost two years when, in September, 1981, he contacted Ronald Smith and asked if plaintiff would loan him $5,000.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Martin v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Totman v. Royal Oak School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Burch v. a & G Associates, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Poe v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Leitch v. SwitchenkoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Sanders v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  4. Arthur Merriweather v. Michael EllisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Michael Kassed v. Shant AtikanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API