Legal Opinion
Briggs v. M & J Diesel Locomotive Filter Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 10, 1965No. Nos. 14683-14685PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASTLE, Circuit Judge.
Southwick W. Briggs and Stone Filter Company, Incorporated, (Stone) plaintiffs-appellees, the owner and licensee, respectively, of Briggs Patents Nos. 2,-395,449 and 2,919,8071 brought suits in the District Court charging each of the defendants-appellants2 with infringement of certain claims of the patents3 and seeking injunctive relief and damages. The defendants denied infringement and asserted invalidity of the patents. The three actions were consolidated for trial.
Following a trial before the court without a jury, the District Court filed a memorandum of decision…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Binks Manufacturing Company, Etc. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Lever Bros. Co. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Edward Valves, Inc., and Rockwell Manufacturing Company v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Aerosol Research Company v. Scovill Manufacturing Company (A. Schrader's Son Division)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Medical Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Medical Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Continental Can CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Woodstream Corporation v. Herter's, Inc. And George L. HerterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.