Legal Opinion

People v. Flynn

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 2000No. B123817PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*769Opinion

O’NEILL, J.*

I. Introduction

Defendant, Christopher Flynn, was sentenced to state prison following his conviction of robbery. He now argues insufficiency of evidence, improper exclusion of the victim’s prior misdemeanor conduct, and erroneous denial of a motion for new trial. The People oppose these contentions and note the absence of a mandatory parole revocation fine. We modify the judgment and affirm. In the published portion of our opinion, we uphold a robbery conviction on the theory that the perpetrator used fear to accomplish retention of the property after it was taken.

II.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. FlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API