Deal v. Fredrickson Motor Express Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.
Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to grant its motion for nonsuit interposed at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.
Plaintiffs ■ contend that the bill of lading issued by the initial carrier in Lumberton created a presumption that the stove top was received for shipment in good condition; that by introducing the bill of lading in evidence and offering evidence that the property was found damaged when received by the consignee, plaintiffs made out *489a 'prima facie case. Our review of pertinent Supreme Court decisions impels us to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Star Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- McDaniel v. Atlantic Coast Line RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Home Products Corp. v. Howell's Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980