Kehoe v. Mayor of Rutherford
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
On October 15th, 1888, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract, under seal, by which the plaintiff became bound to grade, work, shape, level, smooth and roll Montrose avenue, in the borough of Eutherford, to its entire width, according to the established grade, commencing at Washington avenue and ending at Pierpont avenue, and the defendant became bound to pay him therefor sixty-five cents per lineal or running foot.
Soon afterwards the plaintiff began the work, and continued until it was discovered that some of the land to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Shannon v. ComstockNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Ankeny v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Derby v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
3Cited by12 opinions
- Westmount Country Club v. KamenyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- JL Davis & Associates v. HeidlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Goldman v. ShapiroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- De Ponte v. Mutual Contracting Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Wentink v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.