Seymour v. PPG Industries, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONTI, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a motion challenging the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over this collective action on the basis of mootness following the rejection by plaintiffs of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 offer of judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied because the court continues properly to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over this action.
I. Introduction and Procedural History
Plaintiffs in this collective action are former employees of defendant PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG” or “defendant”).…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kuntze v. Josh Enters., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- DEVINE v. NORTHEAST TREATMENT CENTERS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- IVANOVS v. BAYADA HOME HEALTH CARE, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- VIDALS HERNANDEZ v. POLLY, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022