Legal Opinion

Seymour v. PPG Industries, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-1707PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONTI, District Judge.

Presently before the court is a motion challenging the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over this collective action on the basis of mootness following the rejection by plaintiffs of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 offer of judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied because the court continues properly to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over this action.

I. Introduction and Procedural History

Plaintiffs in this collective action are former employees of defendant PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG” or “defendant”).…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kuntze v. Josh Enters., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
  2. DEVINE v. NORTHEAST TREATMENT CENTERS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. IVANOVS v. BAYADA HOME HEALTH CARE, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  4. VIDALS HERNANDEZ v. POLLY, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API