Legal Opinion

Wanta v. Perszyk

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 12, ,1932:

Fritz, J.

Five of the plaintiffs are the children and heirs at law of John and Marcianna Schramka, and as such heirs instituted this action to establish their title and claim against any claim of the defendants to the land involved herein; and to forever bar the defendants from claiming any right, title, or interest to or in such land adversely to plaintiffs. The defendants, respectively, are the surviving widow, children, and heirs of Teofil Potrykus, and the wife of one of those children. Only Anna Perszyk and Mamie Perszyk filed an answer…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Parker v. KaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Curry v. ColburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Smith v. CrossTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Smith v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Kirby v. KirbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quarles v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  2. Estate of Onstad v. OnstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Perszyk v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Roebken v. CarbysWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Brown v. SealCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API