Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 7, 1989No. 70342PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PATRICIA DOUGHERTY MacGUIGAN, Judge:

Appellee who carried automobile insurance including uninsured motorist coverage with Appellant was injured by the negligence of another in an automobile accident. The negligent party (tort-feasor) had a liability policy with the Farmers Insurance Company with the limits of $10,000. Ap-pellee sought recovery directly from Appellant under the uninsured motorist coverage without claiming first against the tort-fea-sor. The trial court found that Appellee suffered injuries with a reasonable value of $60,000 and entered judgment therefor. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WendtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Barfield v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Porter v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Burch v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Weatherly v. FlournoyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Boyer v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API