Legal Opinion

Wysocki v. Crump

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided December 20, 2011No. 10-3258Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge:

This cause is before the Court on Defendant Karen Crump’s Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 16). Because this Court finds that Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity on the individual capacity claim and the Eleventh Amendment bars the official capacity claim, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

I. FACTS

On summary judgment, this Court considers the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Valance v. Wisel, 110 F.3d 1269, 1276 (7th Cir.1997). In her Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff states that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API