Legal Opinion

Office of Administration v. State Employees' Retirement Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2015No. 925 C.D. 2015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge P. KEVIN. BROBSON.

The Office of Administration (OA) and Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) (collectively, Petitioners), petition this Court for review of an order of the State Employees’ Retirement Board (the Board). The Board’s order granted the request of Bruce Edwards, Joseph Sarkis, and Joseph Kovel (collectively, Claimants) and the Pennsylvania State Troopers Association (PSTA) that the State Employee Retirement System . (SERS) accept and include as retirement-covered compensation the additional monies paid to Claimants while on union officer .leave. For the reasons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beardsley v. State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Kirsch v. Public School Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Weaver v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Admin. & Pa. State Police v. State Employees' Ret. Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Office of Admin & PSP, Aplts. v. SERBSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API