Legal Opinion
Moss v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided October 19, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Richard L. Moss appeals a decision of the Court of Chancery confirming an arbitration award originally extended in favor of Moss’ former employer, Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (“Prudential-Bache”) by a New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”) arbitration panel in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (the “Act”) 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-15 (1988). On appeal Moss contends that the Court of Chancery lacked “jurisdiction” 1 under the Act to consider Prudential-Bache’s claim. We disagree. The Federal Arbitration Act clearly vests concurrent subject matter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Motion Picture Laboratory Technicians Local 780, I.A.T.S.E. v. McGregor & Werner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Candlewood Timber Group, LLC v. Pan American Energy, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. MidcapSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- TD Ameritrade, Inc. v. McLaughlin, Piven, Vogel Securities, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.