Legal Opinion
Julie Baking Co. v. Graymond
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoestadter, J.
This motion presents a question not heretofore decided by any of the reported cases. While the courts have dealt extensively with the subject of picketing in labor disputes, the propriety of picketing for purposes other than expressing demands of labor has never been decided.
I conceive that it is clear in reason and principle that picketing not accompanied “ by violence, threats or intimidation, express or implied ” and having a lawful purpose, should not be enjoined. (Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc., v. Rifkin, 245 N. Y. 260; J. H. & S. Theatres v. Fay, 260 id. 315; Tree Mark Shoe Co. v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Tree-Mark Shoe Co. v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MasielloNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Springfield, Bayside Corp. v. HochmanNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Anora Amusement Corp. v. "John Doe"New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Rosman v. United Strictly Kosher Butchers, U. V. Local No. 1, Bronx, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Individual Retail Food Store Owners Ass'n v. Penn Treaty Food Stores Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.