Springfield, Bayside Corp. v. Hochman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Fitzpatrick, J.
Plaintiff moves, pursuant to CPLR 6301, for an order enjoining the defendants, pendente lite, “ from picketing the premises of this plaintiff in a manner threatened by them to urge prospective tenants not to rent and otherwise interfere with the business of the plaintiff ”.
The complaint, which contains a single cause of action, and the exhibits annexed to and made a part thereof, disclose the following. Plaintiff is the landlord of a garden apartment development, in which all of the named defendants are tenants, and maintains a management office for said development at 67-01 Springfield…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. WohlSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- West Willow Realty Corp. v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Saxon Motor Sales, Inc. v. TorinoNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Julie Baking Co. v. GraymondNew York Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mazzocone v. WillingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Pittman v. Cohn Communities, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Whitby Operating Corp. v. SchleissnerNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Walinsky v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Dicta Realty Associates v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.