Legal Opinion

Reid v. Southworth

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for La Crosse County. The case is stated in the opinion. To the point that the party moving to set aside a judgment entered upon warrant of attorney must show that he has been subjected to some injustice before the court will interfere, they cited Van Steenwyck v. 8ae!cett, 17 Wis. 645, 657; Melndoe v. Hazelton, 19 id. 567; Ilerfurth v. Biederstaedt, 43 id. 633; Pirie v. Hughes, id. 531; Rollins v. Kahn, 66 id. 658.

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, 0. J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside judgments between these parties. It is stipulated that the appeals from the order in each case be consolidated, and that they be treated as one appeal. The judgments were, entered upon warrants of attorney included in the same instruments with the promissory notes given by the defendant. These notes were dated Eebruary 3,1881, and became due, one in four months and the other, in six months from date. Judgments were entered on the warrants of attorney on each note, February 11 th, eight days after the notes were given, and before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MuellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Adam v. ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Sloane v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. McCabe v. SumnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Dilley v. Van WieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Milwaukee Worsted MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. ClementsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Federal Land Bank v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. First Nat. Bank of Danville v. CunninghamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1891
  5. Reeves v. KrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API