Legal Opinion

V.F. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1983No. 7072PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This is an appeal brought by V.F. from an order of the superior court terminating her parental rights as to her four minor daughters, H.F., D.F., R.F. and M.B. V.F. contends that the judgment should be reversed because she did not have the effective assistance of counsel during the proceedings. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that parents have a constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel in proceedings brought to terminate their parental rights. We conclude, however, *44that V.F. was not deprived of this right and we therefore affirm the judgment.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Reece v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Risher v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. In re A.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. B.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. Matter of K.L.J.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. S.B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API