Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hall

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1910No. 7541PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Aldrich-, J., Anderson, October -Term, 1909. Action by Cora T. Hall et al. against Carl M. Hall et al. From circuit decree, defendants appeal. cite: Pee simple theory: 47 S. C., 294; 6 Ency., 504; 2 Jar. on Wills, 856; 15 S-. C., 442; 8 D. & R., 804. The conditioned theory: 2 Bail., 248; Moorman on Rim., 18; 47 S. C., 294; 17 S. C., 434; 4 S. C., 83; I Rich. Eq., 400; 3 Rich.

Read the full summary

Before Aldrich-, J., Anderson, October -Term, 1909. Action by Cora T. Hall et al. against Carl M. Hall et al. From circuit decree, defendants appeal. cite: Pee simple theory: 47 S. C., 294; 6 Ency., 504; 2 Jar. on Wills, 856; 15 S-. C., 442; 8 D. & R., 804. The conditioned theory: 2 Bail., 248; Moorman on Rim., 18; 47 S. C., 294; 17 S. C., 434; 4 S. C., 83; I Rich. Eq., 400; 3 Rich. Eq., 574, 156; 23 S. C., 46; 15 Ency., 323; 67 S. C., 134; 100 Mass. 345; 5 Ency., 323-; 3 Jar. on Wills, 15; 3 Har., 56; .1 Jones, 370; Walk., 420; 141 U. S., 296; 166 U. S., 83; 18 How., 202; 2 Jar., 1174.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The will of A. Jackson Hall, who died in 1892, contained the following clause: “At, or after the death of my beloved wife, I give and devise unto my beloved son, T. D. Hall, and his heirs fifty-five acres (55), more or less, of land to be run off in a tract broadside next to the lands of J. B. Reverett, also some three (3) acres, more or less woodland on west side of the road leading to Crossroads Church, said land soon to be run off all that is in certain bounds, all this land is of the Ransom tract, and I also after her death give…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. ErwinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  2. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  3. Durant v. NashSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
  4. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  5. Archer v. EllisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drummond v. DrummondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. Branyon v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Ex Parte DarbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API