Legal Opinion
People v. Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the statements he made to the police should have been suppressed on the ground that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights. At the Huntley hearing, defendant presented a special education teacher, a diagnostician and a psychologist, all of whom testified that defendant suffered from a severe auditory processing disability which prevented him from understanding or processing information given to him. The diagnostician opined that defendant could not understand the meaning of the Miranda warnings even…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. BucknorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. PitsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. SilerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. DadouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.