Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ernsting v. Ave Maria College

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 2007No. Docket No. 265187Published

1DissentZahra, J.

I respectfully dissent. While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that a federal law enforcement agency may be considered a public body under the Michigan Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.361 et seq., I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Department of Education *520(DOE), with its Office of Inspector General (OIG), is a law enforcement agency under the WPA. I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The dispositive issue in this case turns on the meaning of the term “law enforcement agency” as it is used in the WPA. As observed by the majority, this term is not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re KHMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Scott M Cain v. Waste Management IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re FakettyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API