Legal Opinion

People v. Totman

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1901No. Crim No. 771PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

Defendant was accused by information with the crime of rape. He demurred to the information, which demurrer was overruled. He was thereafter tried and convicted. Thereupon he moved for a new trial, which motion was denied, also a motion in arrest of judgment. From the final judgment and from the order overruling his motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted.

The rape was alleged to have been committed on June 26, 1900, upon Augusta E. Moullen, an orphan, fourteen years of age, residing on a ranch in Fresno County with her aunt and the defendant, who was her uncle.

The appellant claims…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. People v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Furrey v. LautzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API