Legal Opinion

Harris v. Kane

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0879Published

1Opinion of the Court

JU l UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT clerk U s t -1 2013 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts for the gfggghtgl m 3 WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) . v ) Civil Action No. l 1 '-l <` ) THE UNITED STATES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION For purposes of this Memorandum Opinion, the court consolidates two complaints that the plaintiff submitted to the Clerk of Court on May 20, 2013. Upon review of the plaintiff’ s applications to proceed in forma pauperis and each pro se civil complaint, the court will grant the applications and dismiss the complaints. The Court is mindful that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API