Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 31, 2008No. Nos. 04-4115, 04-4174, 04-4182, 04-4190, 04-4281PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On July 2, 2004, a jury found William Oscar Harris, Reginald Lundy, Reginald Wooten, Arthur Outterbridge, and Robert McCurdy guilty on all counts of a twenty-three count indictment charging each of them with one count of conspiracy to produce and pass false and fictitious money orders, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and multiple counts of willfully, knowingly, and with intent to defraud, passing, issuing or transmitting false and fictitious securities or other instruments, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 514(1)(2) and 2. Following sentencing, notices of appeal were filed. We have…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Anselmo GomezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harris v. KaneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Harris v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API