Legal Opinion

Black Dog Outfitters, Inc. v. Idaho Outfitters & Guides Licensing Board

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided May 13, 2011No. Civil 09-CV-00663-E-EJLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

EDWARD J. LODGE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court in the above-entitled matter is Defendant United States Department of the Interior/Bureau of Land Management and United States Department of Agriculture/United States Forest Service’s (the “Federal Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. Defendant State of Idaho Outfitters and Guides Licensing Board (“IOGLB”) has filed a non-opposition to the Motion. The Motion is made under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The matter is ripe for the Court’s consideration. Having fully reviewed the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Black Dog Outfitters, Inc. v. Idaho Outfitters & Guides Licensing BoardDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2012
  2. Amos v. Lampo Group, LLC, TheDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
  3. Witzke v. Idaho State Bar, Board of Commissioners of theDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API