Legal Opinion

C.J.D. Rudolph and Irma M. Rudolph v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1961No. 18788_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts are set forth in the opinion of the district court. Rudolph v. United States, 189 F.Supp. 2. The applicable law is to be found in Patterson v. Thomas, 289 F.2d 108, decided by this Court on March 16, 1961. No factual differences call for the application of a different rule or the reaching of a different result than in Patterson v. Thomas. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. George D. Patterson, District Director of Internal Revenue v. J. C. Thomas and Martha ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. Rudolph v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1960

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. John William Gotcher Et Ux.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Rudolph v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. United States v. Roy O. Disney and Edna F. DisneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Peoples Life Insurance Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API