State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Baker
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Relator has filed a petition for writ of prohibition against respondent alleging she was without jurisdiction to grant a motion for new trial. Respondent has filed suggestions in opposition.
The facts are undisputed. The law is clear. In the interest of justice as permitted by Rule 84.24, we dispense with a preliminary order, answer, further briefing and oral argument and issue a peremptory writ of prohibition. See, State ex rel. National Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Seehorn, 354 Mo. 170, 188 S.W.2d 657, 660 (1945).
On May 15,1996, judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of relator and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. National Outdoor Advertising Co. v. SeehornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Citizens Bank of Dexter v. Hall Trailer Sales, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Popular Leasing USA, Inc. v. Universal Art Corp. of New YorkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State ex rel. National Super Markets Inc. v. SweeneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State ex rel. Meek v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998