Legal Opinion

Threatt v. Altus Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 10, 1994No. 1921403PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

We granted certiorari review in order to determine whether the defendant, against whom a default judgment had been entered, was entitled to relief under Rule 60(b), Ala. R.Civ.P., based on her claim that any liability she had to the plaintiff would have been a joint liability with her husband.

On July 11,1990, Altus Bank sued Altharis L. Threatt and her husband, Arthur, alleging that because of an accounting error the Bank had overpaid the Threatts $10,000 when they closed their joint certificate of deposit account with Altus. The Bank sought a return of the $10,000, plus…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Threatt v. Altus BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API