Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McIntyre

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 17, 1989No. 88-735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Justice.

This is an appeal by Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (“Aetna”) from a judgment entered in favor of Frank McIntyre and Rhonda McIntyre. The appeal is from that portion of the judgment in favor of Frank, who is divorced from Rhonda and who failed to appear on the trial date. Aetna alleged that the McIntyres had breached a contract by failing to pay for damage they allegedly caused to property leased to them by Aetna’s insureds. A statement of the facts in this case is unnecessary, because the only issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to enter a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Farzetta v. Turner & Newall, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Gray v. HandySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Roberts v. WettlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Threatt v. Altus BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Threatt v. Altus BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API