People v. O'Brien
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Allegan. (Arnold, J.) Eespondent was convicted of malicious trespass. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The respondent has been twice convicted of a willful trespass upon the improved lands of Levi and Charles H. Loomis, and destroying grain growing thereon, under •section 9174, How. Sfcat.
The case as it appeared in this Court the first time will be found reported in 60 Mich. 8 (26 N. W. Rep. 795).
We do not consider it necessary to discuss the objections raised upon the second trial, and now urged here again, that were by us decided and disposed of when the case was here before. The objections to the complaint and warrant, as to the description of the premises and thb kind of grain destroyed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. O'BrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. AustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. CourtneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. TodaroMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. BaruthWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.