Widronak v. Lord
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
These two actions of tort are to recover damages because of a collision on January 11,1925, between two automobiles at the intersection of Prospect Street and Harvard Street, in Cambridge. The plaintiff Widronak was injured by the collision of Lord’s car with Herman’s car in which Widronak was a passenger. The plaintiff Lord seeks to recover damages caused to his car by the collision.
Lord’s car was moving on Prospect Street. Herman’s car was going in a northerly direction on Harvard Street. This was in violation of an ordinance of the city of Cambridge. So far as material the ordinance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Commonwealth v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Boyd v. EllisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Labay v. LeikenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
3Cited by16 opinions
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Cook v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Potter v. GilmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Query v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Jones v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.