Legal Opinion
Gomon v. Northland Family Physicians, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 2001No. C8-00-1465PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge
Appellants Kirk N. Gomon and Carol Gomon challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment on their medical-malpractice claim in favor of respondents Northland Family Physicians, Ltd., and Harvey D. Smith, M.D., based on the two-year statute of limitations established in MinmStat. § 541.07 (1996). Appellants assert that because their action was commenced after August 1, 1999, the four-year statute of limitations established in Minn. Stat. § 541.076 (Supp.1999) applies. Because we hold that Minn.Stat. § 541.076 does not apply retroactively to revive an action…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Donaldson v. Chase Securities Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Kannellos v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gomon v. Northland Family Physicians, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Morton v. DYSTECourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Patricia L. Larsen v. Mayo FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Gomon v. Northland Family Physicians, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001