Legal Opinion

United States v. Figueroa-Labrada

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 24, 2015No. 13-6278PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORITZ, Circuit Judge.

Jesus Figueroa-Labrada (“Figueroa”) appeals from the district court’s denial of his request for a reduced sentence under the “safety-valve” provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). The district court held § 3553(f) did not apply because Figueroa failed to make the disclosures necessary to support a reduced sentence before his initial sentencing hearing.

Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), we reject the district court’s interpretation of § 3553(f). We conclude that when a defendant provides information to the government for the first time on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dolan v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. United States v. Schmitt DegassoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. George Woodrow FlanaganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Jesus Acosta-OlivasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Brijido Mejia-PimentalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. TheisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API