Legal Opinion
United States v. Jesus Acosta-Olivas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1995No. 94-2281PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals from the district court’s imposition of a seventy-eight month sentence on defendant Jesus Acosta-Olivas. The district court determined that Mr. Aeos-ta-Olivas qualified for a downward departure from the statutory minimum mandatory sentence of ten years, because he met all the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). 1 This appeal addresses the scope of § 3553(f)(5), which requires defendants seeking relief from a statutory mandatory minimum to truthfully provide the government with “all information and evidence the defendant has concerning…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Tomas RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. George L. Phelps, Also Known as George L. Phillips, Also Known as Phillip Lee MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. WrennCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Daleske v. Fairfield Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4598, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7402 United States of America v. Prakash Man Shrestha, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yvonne N. AJUGWO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. William Henry MyersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Shakiru Adu, A/K/A Alhaji ShakiruCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. MontanezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.