Legal Opinion
Goodloe v. City of Richmond
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 23, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming in part and reversing in part.
Because of severe restrictions placed upon the use of public water in Richmond by ordinances, George W. Goodloe laid a pipe line from a well across two streets and the property of W. L. Arnold to a public garage he owned and pumped water through it to supply the needs of his business.
On September 3, 1930, the City of Richmond and the Richmond Water & Light Company joined in a suit against Goodloe to enjoin him from making further excavations in the streets, laying a pipe line across them and using it for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Texas Co. v. BurkettTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- Goodloe v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Nourse v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Farmers' Co-Op. Stock Yards Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Beutel v. Camp Taylor Development Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goodloe v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Goodloe v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- City of Richmond v. GoodloeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Ozark Chemical Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941