Legal Opinion
Ross v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 9, 2015No. 15-240Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORIG!NAI llntbt @nrte! 9ltaftg @ourt otftDersl @luimg No. 15-240C FILED (Filed: July 9,2015) JUL - I 2015 MICHAEL S. ROSS,pro se, U.S. COURTOF FEDERALCI.AIM9 Plaintiff, Pro Se; Rule 12(bX1); Subject-Matter Jurisdiction THE LTNITED STATES, Defendant. Michael S. Ross, Menifee, CA, plaintiff pro se, Christopher K. Ilimbush, Trial Attomey, Claudia Burke, Assistant Director, Robert E' Kirschman, Jr,, Director, Benjamin C. Mizer, Deputy Principal Assistant Attorney General, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant. MEMORANDUM…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Demes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.