Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of Beaumont
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERT J. TIMLIN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Outdoor Media Group, Inc. (“OMG”) and Chance Outdoor, LLC’s (“Chance”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Summary Judgement, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”). Also before the Court is Defendant City of Beaumont’s (the “City” or “Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendant’s Motion”). The Court finds the matters appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Paramount Contractors & Developers, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011