Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Zeppenfeld v. Calhoun

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaues, P. J.

This is an.original proceeding by prohibition, in-which it is sought to prohibit-the respondent, judge one of the divisions of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, from proceeding with the trial of an appeal from the probate court of said city taken from an allowance of an attorney fee for services alleged to have been rendered to the estate of Leo Caplan, then in the course of administration in said probate court.

Our preliminary rule having issued, return was duly made by the respondent which is in the nature of a demurrer, and with the certified record of the proceedings below, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harkness v. JarvisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. Marsala v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Dower v. ConradMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Central Liberty Trust Co. v. RoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Crow v. Estate of LutzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Carlin v. DearmondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Young v. Boatmen's National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API