Central Liberty Trust Co. v. Roy
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCo'X, P. J.
Action by plaintiff upon certain trade acceptances siuned by defendant. Trial by jury and verdict for defendant. Plaintiff then filed a motion for new trial which was sustained by the court but afterward and at a subsequent term of court, the court set aside the order sustaining* plaintiff’s motion for new trial and entered an order overruling* the' motion. Plaintiff then appealed.
This case has a peculiar history as to the question of practice. The case was tried at the January Term, 1922, of the Douglas County Circuit Court and a verdict returned for defendant. Within four days, plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Downs v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Ewart v. PenistonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Marsala v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Bank of Polk v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- State ex rel. Iba v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taylor v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Spangler-Bowers v. BentonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
- Mountain States Implement Co. v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Peoples Bank of Holcomb v. BullockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
- Mountain States Implement Co. v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.