Penny v. Anaconda Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell
This is an appeal by claimant Arthur W. Penny from a judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court and an order denying his petition for rehearing. The hearing examiner found that Penny suffered a permanent partial disability to the whole man of 25% and was entitled to receive benefits under section 39-71-703, MCA, as a result of compensable injuries suffered while working for the Anaconda Company, the employer and respondent. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the hearing examiner were adopted by the Workers’ Compensation Judge in his judgment and order of July 1, 1980.
Penny…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guarascio v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1962
- Harmon v. Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Willis v. Taylor & Fenn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- McGee v. Bechtel Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pinyerd v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1995