Legal Opinion

Penny v. Anaconda Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1981No. 80-439PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell

This is an appeal by claimant Arthur W. Penny from a judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court and an order denying his petition for rehearing. The hearing examiner found that Penny suffered a permanent partial disability to the whole man of 25% and was entitled to receive benefits under section 39-71-703, MCA, as a result of compensable injuries suffered while working for the Anaconda Company, the employer and respondent. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the hearing examiner were adopted by the Workers’ Compensation Judge in his judgment and order of July 1, 1980.

Penny…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guarascio v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Harmon v. Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Willis v. Taylor & Fenn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. McGee v. Bechtel Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pinyerd v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API